Shelley Stewart

The provincial budget season is winding down, with just PEI and Newfoundland and Labrador still to table their FY26/27 documents. Here are five themes:

Deep deficits persist: A few provinces are slipping deeper into the red, while a few are moving to slightly shallower shortfalls. As a group, the chunky $40 billion deficit for the fiscal year just ending (FY25/26) will persist in FY26/27, with a combined shortfall of $46.7 billion expected. That’s a manageable 1.4% of GDP, but topped only twice in the past two decades: at the depth of the pandemic, and the depth of the financial crisis.

Certainly uncertain: This year’s budget season acknowledged the wild uncertainty in macroeconomic conditions. But, unlike last year, where every province seemingly took a different approach to setting an economic outlook (assume tariffs, no tariffs, publish different scenarios, etc.), this year was largely based on a ‘normal’ baseline economic outlook and a status quo on trade policy. With that in mind, the group overall has embedded more than $10 billion of contingencies into the FY26/27 fiscal plan, leaving some room for upside if the economy holds up.

Revenue gusher (for some): The two big oil-producing provinces locked in their budgets ahead of the conflict in Iran and associated surge in oil prices. Now, budget assumptions look wildly conservative. Alberta assumed $60.50 for WTI this fiscal year and Saskatchewan assumed $59.80 (Newfoundland & Labrador still to be tabled). At current levels for WTI, the light-heavy differential and the loonie, we could see upwards of $20 billion of revenue upside in those two provinces alone, swinging both well back into surplus.

Debt climbing: The combined provincial net debt-to-GDP ratio is looking to push 32% in FY26/27, which would be a fourth consecutive increase from the post-pandemic lows. Recall that there was meaningful fiscal consolidation during that period when inflation and nominal growth were ripping. Interestingly, debt ratios don’t look any worse than they did a year ago thanks to hefty upward nominal GDP revisions, but the provinces are clearly still open to borrowing. This year’s long-term borrowing program is on pace to run at around $140 billion, just a shade lower than seen over the prior two years and the pandemic high. Indeed, while the combined provincial deficit is running at $47 billion this fiscal year, combined net debt is going to surge by $80 billion, or 2.5% of GDP, which is more reflective of underlying finances. Combined with the federal government, this truer fiscal gap in Canada is closer to 4.5% of GDP.

Policy steady: There were no show-stopping policy changes at the provincial level this budget season. While there were no major tax changes, some provinces nudged taxes higher (e.g., B.C. broadening the PST base and lifting income taxes), while others pushed through some targeted policy (e.g., Ontario expanding the HST rebate on new homes to all buyers). In general, the provinces continue to focus heavily on infrastructure, still catching up to past population growth (hence the hefty borrowing program), while program spending looks to run strong at more than 4% overall. The federal government continues to do more of the stimulus leg work, and that could continue with any new measures announced in the upcoming federal fiscal update.

Although Canada faces near-term hurdles to its plans to increase AI data center infrastructure due to constrained generation and transmission capacity, the country is not out of the race to attract more of the expected capital expenditures on data centers. Many countries are also dealing with similar grid constraints, which means that regions that can adapt their electricity sectors quickly to enable new large loads to connect to supply in a timely manner will come out ahead.

This situation creates an opportunity for Canada to create conditions that can enable faster data center connection to the grid or to off-grid alternatives. The ‘bring your own generation’ model that is being explored by Alberta is one such promising tool. Data center companies in Texas are already opting for this option as it is faster than waiting to be connected to the grid. Also, other regions are considering it as a way to shelter ratepayers from the costs of building new generation and transmission for data centers. Ontario, on the other hand, can lean on its advantage as the first jurisdiction in North America to build a small modular reactor (SMR). One way to do this would be to include SMRs in the new corporate power purchase agreements program, which allows companies to procure their own generation. The proposed 40 GW offshore wind farm in Nova Scotia is another potential generation source that could support a data center industry in Atlantic Canada.

Whatever policies and tools are used, protecting ratepayers from electricity price increases will be important for gaining public support. Governments can look to jurisdictions in the U.S. and elsewhere for lessons on what can be done differently to avoid repeating actions that have contributed to rising retail electricity prices in other markets like the PJM Interconnection.